{"id":12717,"date":"2012-05-29T09:30:15","date_gmt":"2012-05-29T08:30:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/davidbosman.fr\/blog\/2012\/05\/29\/liking-is-for-cowards-go-for-what-hurts\/"},"modified":"2012-06-12T12:26:14","modified_gmt":"2012-06-12T10:26:14","slug":"liking-is-for-cowards-go-for-what-hurts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.davidbosman.fr\/blog\/2012\/05\/29\/liking-is-for-cowards-go-for-what-hurts\/","title":{"rendered":"Liking Is for Cowards. Go for What Hurts"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote>   <p>(\u2026) our technology has become extremely adept at creating products that correspond to our fantasy ideal of an erotic relationship, in which the beloved object asks for nothing and gives everything, instantly, and makes us feel all powerful, and doesn\u2019t throw terrible scenes when it\u2019s replaced by an even sexier object and is consigned to a drawer.<\/p>    <p>(\u2026)<\/p>    <p>Let me suggest, finally, that the world of techno-consumerism is therefore troubled by real love, and that it has no choice but to trouble love in turn.<\/p>    <p>Its first line of defense is to commodify its enemy. (\u2026)<\/p>    <p>A related phenomenon is the transformation, courtesy of Facebook, of the verb \u201cto like\u201d from a state of mind to an action that you perform with your computer mouse, from a feeling to an assertion of consumer choice. And liking, in general, is commercial culture\u2019s substitute for loving. The striking thing about all consumer products \u2014 and none more so than electronic devices and applications \u2014 is that they\u2019re designed to be immensely likable. This is, in fact, the definition of a consumer product, in contrast to the product that is simply itself and whose makers aren\u2019t fixated on your liking it. (I\u2019m thinking here of jet engines, laboratory equipment, serious art and literature.)<\/p>    <p>Alongside their built-in eagerness to be liked is a built-in eagerness to reflect well on us. Our lives look a lot more interesting when they\u2019re filtered through the sexy Facebook interface. We star in our own movies, we photograph ourselves incessantly, we click the mouse and a machine confirms our sense of mastery.<\/p>    <p>(\u2026) And, since our technology is really just an extension of ourselves, we don\u2019t have to have contempt for its manipulability in the way we might with actual people. It\u2019s all one big endless loop. We like the mirror and the mirror likes us. To friend a person is merely to include the person in our private hall of flattering mirrors.<\/p>    <p>I may be overstating the case, a little bit. (\u2026)<\/p>    <p>There is no such thing as a person whose real self you like every particle of. This is why a world of liking is ultimately a lie. But there is such a thing as a person whose real self you love every particle of. And this is why love is such an existential threat to the techno-consumerist order: it exposes the lie.<\/p>    <p>This is not to say that love is only about fighting. Love is about bottomless empathy, born out of the heart\u2019s revelation that another person is every bit as real as you are.<\/p>    <p>(\u2026) <\/p>    <p>to love a specific person, and to identify with his or her struggles and joys as if they were your own, you have to surrender some of your self.<\/p>    <p>The big risk here, of course, is rejection. We can all handle being disliked now and then, because there\u2019s such an infinitely big pool of potential likers. But to expose your whole self, not just the likable surface, and to have it rejected, can be catastrophically painful. The prospect of pain generally, the pain of loss, of breakup, of death, is what makes it so tempting to avoid love and stay safely in the world of liking.<\/p>    <p>And yet pain hurts but it doesn\u2019t kill. When you consider the alternative \u2014 an anesthetized dream of self-sufficiency, abetted by technology \u2014 pain emerges as the natural product and natural indicator of being alive in a resistant world. To go through a life painlessly is to have not lived. Even just to say to yourself, \u201cOh, I\u2019ll get to that love and pain stuff later, maybe in my 30s\u201d is to consign yourself to 10 years of merely taking up space on the planet and burning up its resources. Of being (and I mean this in the most damning sense of the word) a consumer.<\/p>    <p>(Jonathan Franzen: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/05\/29\/opinion\/29franzen.html?_r=3&amp;pagewanted=all\">Liking Is for Cowards. Go for What Hurts<\/a>)<\/p> <\/blockquote>\n\n<p>On peut penser ce que l\u2019on veut des critiques de Franzen \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9gard des nouvelles technologies ou des r\u00e9seaux sociaux (Facebook c\u2019est mauvais, Twitter <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/books\/2012\/mar\/07\/jonathan-franzen-calls-twitter-irresponsible\">aussi<\/a>, et je vous dis pas <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/books\/2012\/jan\/30\/jonathan-franzen-ebooks-values\">les ebooks<\/a>) \u2014 ce g\u00e9nial romancier qui utilise un ordinateur dont il arrach\u00e9 la carte WiFi et bouch\u00e9 le port Ethernet, pour \u00e9crire sans acc\u00e9der au Web \u2014 on aurait tout int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 ne pas se r\u00e9fugier derri\u00e8re la caricature de son propos ou la moquerie, et \u00e9couter ce qu\u2019il dit (ses phrases sont \u00e9paisses). <\/p>\n\n<p>Si vous ne lisez pas l\u2019anglais, j\u2019aurais aim\u00e9 avoir le temps de vous traduire au moins les passages que je cite de son papier : toutes mes excuses. J\u2019essayerai de le faire dans la semaine, mais je ne sais pas quand.<\/p>\n\n<p><b>Edit:<\/b> un grand merci \u00e0 <a href=\"http:\/\/davidbosman.fr\/blog\/2012\/05\/29\/liking-is-for-cowards-go-for-what-hurts\/#comment-13562\">Arnaud<\/a> pour sa traduction :<\/p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>Notre technologie est devenue extr\u00eamement adepte de cr\u00e9er des produits qui correspondent \u00e0 notre fantasme d\u2019une relation \u00e9rotique, dans laquelle l\u2019\u00eatre aim\u00e9 ne demande rien et donne tout, imm\u00e9diatement, nous fait nous sentir puissant et ne provoque pas de terribles sc\u00e8nes quand il est remplac\u00e9 par un autre plus sexy et mis au rencart.\n  <br><br>\n  Permettez moi de sugg\u00e9rer, finalement, que le monde du techno-consum\u00e9risme est du coup troubl\u00e9 par le vrai amour, et qu\u2019il n\u2019a pas d\u2019autre choix que de le troubler en retour.\n  <br><br>\n  Sa premi\u00e8re ligne de d\u00e9fense est de marchandiser son ennemi.\n  <br><br>\n  Un ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne connexe est la transformation, avec la permission de Facebook, du verbe \u00ab Appr\u00e9cier \u00bb, d\u2019un \u00e9tat d\u2019esprit \u00e0 une action que vous effectuez avec votre souris d\u2019ordinateur, d\u2019un sentiment \u00e0 l\u2019affirmation de choix du consommateur. Et appr\u00e9cier, en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, est un substitut d\u2019aimer pour la culture commerciale. Ce qui est frappant avec tous les produits de consommation \u2013 et aucun d\u2019autant plus avec les dispositifs \u00e9lectroniques et les applications \u2013 c\u2019est qu\u2019ils sont con\u00e7us pour \u00eatre extr\u00eamement sympathique. C\u2019est, en fait, la d\u00e9finition d\u2019un produit de consommation, en comparaison avec le produit qui n\u2019est tout simplement que lui-m\u00eame et dont les producteurs ne font pas une fixation sur votre appr\u00e9ciation. (Je pense ici \u00e0 des moteurs \u00e0 r\u00e9action, de l\u2019\u00e9quipement de laboratoire, de l\u2019art et la litt\u00e9rature s\u00e9rieuse.)\n  <br><br>\n  Parall\u00e8lement \u00e0 leur empressement intrins\u00e8que \u00e0 \u00eatre aim\u00e9, ils ont un empressement \u00e0 nous renvoyer une bonne image. Nos vies semblent beaucoup plus int\u00e9ressantes filtr\u00e9es \u00e0 travers l\u2019interface sexy de Facebook. Nous sommes les stars dans nos films, nous nous photographions sans cesse, il suffit de cliquer sur la souris et une machine confirme notre sentiment de ma\u00eetrise.\n  <br><br>\n  (\u2026) Et, comme notre technologie n\u2019est vraiment plus qu\u2019une extension de nous-m\u00eames, nous n\u2019avons pas \u00e0 avoir du m\u00e9pris pour son usage comme nous pourrions en avoir avec des personnes r\u00e9elles. C\u2019est une grande boucle sans fin. Nous aimons le miroir et le miroir nous aime. Devenir ami avec une personne revient \u00e0 l\u2019inclure dans notre salon priv\u00e9 de miroirs flatteurs.\n  <br><br>\n  J\u2019exag\u00e8re peut \u00eatre un peu. (\u2026)\n  <br><br>\n  \u00c7a n\u2019existe pas une personne qui appr\u00e9cie tout chez vous. C\u2019est pourquoi un monde d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation \u00bb est finalement un mensonge. Mais il existe des personnes qui aiment chacune de vos particules. Et c\u2019est pourquoi l\u2019amour est telle une menace existentielle pour l\u2019ordre techno-consum\u00e9riste: elle expose le mensonge.\n  <br><br>\n  Cela ne veut pas dire que l\u2019amour n\u2019est que combats. L\u2019amour, c\u2019est l\u2019empathie sans fond, n\u00e9e de la r\u00e9v\u00e9lation intime qu\u2019une autre personne est tout aussi r\u00e9elle que vous l\u2019\u00eates.\n  <br><br>\n  (\u2026)\n  <br><br>\n  Pour aimer une personne en particulier, et s\u2019identifier \u00e0 ses luttes et ses joies, comme s\u2019ils \u00e9taient les v\u00f4tres, vous devez renoncer \u00e0 une partie de vous.\n  <br><br>\n  Le plus grand risque ici, bien s\u00fbr, est le rejet. Nous pouvons tous supporter \u00eatre des-appr\u00e9ci\u00e9 de temps \u00e0 autre, parce qu\u2019il y a un r\u00e9servoir si infiniment grand de likers potentiels. Mais exposer tout votre \u00eatre, et pas seulement la surface sympathique, et \u00eatre rejet\u00e9, peut \u00eatre douloureusement catastrophique. La perspective de la douleur en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, la douleur de la perte, de la rupture, de la mort, c\u2019est ce qui rend si tentant d\u2019\u00e9viter l\u2019amour et de rester en toute s\u00e9curit\u00e9 dans le monde de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation.\n  <br><br>\n  Et pourtant, la douleur fait mal mais ne tue pas. Lorsque vous consid\u00e9rez l\u2019alternative \u2013 un r\u00eave anesth\u00e9si\u00e9 d\u2019auto-suffisance, encourag\u00e9 par la technologie \u2013 la douleur \u00e9merge comme le produit naturel et l\u2019indicateur de la vie dans un monde r\u00e9sistant. Passer une vie sans douleur revient \u00e0 ne pas vivre. M\u00eame juste pour vous dire, \u00ab Oh, je m\u2019occuperais de ces affaires d\u2019amour et de douleur plus tard, peut-\u00eatre vers mes 30 ans \u00bb vous rel\u00e8gue pendant 10 ans \u00e0 simplement prendre de l\u2019espace sur la plan\u00e8te et br\u00fbler ses ressources. A \u00eatre (et je le dis dans le sens le plus accablant du mot) un consommateur.\n  <br><br>\n  (Jonathan Franzen: Appr\u00e9cier est pour les l\u00e2ches, allez vers ce qui fait mal.)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(\u2026) our technology has become extremely adept at creating products that correspond to our fantasy ideal of an erotic relationship, in which the beloved object asks for nothing and gives everything, instantly, and makes us feel all powerful, and doesn\u2019t &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbosman.fr\/blog\/2012\/05\/29\/liking-is-for-cowards-go-for-what-hurts\/\">Read more &rarr;<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[4],"class_list":["post-12717","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chose-a-dit","tag-societe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbosman.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12717","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbosman.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbosman.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbosman.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbosman.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12717"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbosman.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12717\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12853,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbosman.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12717\/revisions\/12853"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbosman.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12717"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbosman.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12717"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbosman.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12717"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}